DeepSeek has changed how the world sees China. Worries over the country’s “3D” problem — that deflation, debt and demographics are structurally hampering growth — have melted away. Instead, investors are talking about how the world’s second-largest economy could take on the US and challenge its technological dominance.
There is the prevailing sense that China’s “engineer dividend” is finally paying off. Between 2000 and 2020, the number of engineers has ballooned from 5.2 million to 17.7 million, according to the State Council. That reservoir could help the nation move up the production possibility frontier, the thinking goes.
In a way, DeepSeek should not have come as a surprise. Size matters. A bigger talent pool alone gives China a better chance to disrupt. In 2022, 47 percent of the world’s top 20th percentile artificial intelligence (AI) researchers finished their undergraduate studies in China, well above the 18 percent share from the US, according to data from the Paulson Institute’s in-house think tank, MacroPolo. Last year, the Asian nation ranked third in the number of innovation indicators compiled by the World Intellectual Property Organization, after Singapore and the US.
What this also means is that innovative breakthroughs can pop out of nowhere. Hangzhou-based DeepSeek, for one, was not spawned from the prestigious Tsinghua University in Beijing. Its founder, Liang Wenfeng (梁文鋒), went to Zhejiang University, a respected institution, but by no means China’s Harvard. This month, Manus AI once again fueled questions about the US lead on AI by launching a sophisticated product capable of carrying out complex tasks such as stock analysis and resume screening. Chief executive Xiao Hong (肖弘) studied software engineering at Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, an even lesser-known school.
Or consider start-up Unitree Robotics, whose “kung fu bots” are at the forefront of the US-China race to mass produce AI-powered humanlike robots. Its founder, Wang Xingxing (王興興), only managed to attend a local university in Shanghai, because his English exam score was dismal. In other words, do not just look at the top 1 percent to judge what China could achieve. Today, graduates from lower-ranked universities and living in smaller cities are coming out with innovations that dazzle.
More importantly, China’s got the cost advantage. Those under the age of 30 account for 44 percent of the total engineering pool, versus 20 percent in the US, according to data compiled by Kaiyuan Securities. As a result, compensation for researchers is only about one-eighth of that in the US.
Credit must be given to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for his focus on higher education as he seeks to upgrade China’s value chain. These days, roughly 40 percent of high-school graduates go to universities, versus 10 percent in 2000. Meanwhile, engineering is one of the most popular majors for post-graduate studies.
It is a welcome reprieve for a government that has been struggling with a shrinking population. Last year, only 9.5 million babies were born, a sharp decline from about 15 million annually before the pandemic. This number was particularly ominous — last year was the Year of the Dragon, which, according to Chinese zodiac beliefs, is considered an auspicious time to have children. An aging society, combined with worries that the exports-driven growth engine is losing steam, are leading to worries that China might become the next Japan, lost for decades to come.
The engineer narrative therefore heralds a fresh growth model. Yes, China’s labor force is aging rapidly. Yes, compared with Southeast Asia, wages have become too high for traditional exports such as smartphones and apparel. However, its engineers are still young, cheap and abundant. As a result, they open new possibilities for the country, perhaps even rivaling the West in the development of biotech, humanoid and AI applications.
By now, Beijing has practically given up defending its traditional export sectors, knowing full well the country has lost its key advantage. Instead, it would double down on developing the engineering talent pool for new sources of growth. As such, those with a bullish thesis on US tech need to consider the structural challenge China poses: Would it disrupt tech just like it did with clothes and houseware?
Shuli Ren is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian markets. A former investment banker, she was a markets reporter for Barron’s. She is a CFA charterholder. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS